[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)

Panu Matilainen notifications at github.com
Thu Mar 23 10:45:50 UTC 2023


> This might be a dumb question
> 
> > sizes are always 64bit ... RPMSIGTAG_LONGSIZE
> 
> If "header + payload" signatures are going away, is there any reason to continue storing the combined "header + payload" size? In other words, can this not also be ditched?

It's actually a good question. The size tags in the signature are an unreliable source of information, and not actually needed for anything. Rpm only "uses" them for debug-printing the information IIRC.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5404121
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2374/comments/5404121 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20230323/6d426eca/attachment.html>


More information about the Rpm-maint mailing list