[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Introduce an rpm-controlled per-build directory (PR #2885)

[Panu Matilainen]

The thing is (well, one of the things) is that, foo-1.0/foo-1.0 can mask a bug or packaging error. The ugly -PKG suffix was absolutely necessary for seeing which path a thing is actually trying to use when developing this PR, and will be equally necessary for packagers trying to troubleshoot something more exotic.

So it doesn't need to be -PKG but it needs to be something that is easily distinguishable from something %setup normally does.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2885#issuecomment-1931703744
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2885/c1931703744 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240207/58bcf705/attachment.html>