[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Introduction of "rpms.lock.yaml" file (Discussion #2908)

[Erik Skultety]

@lubomir while possible by the format I think having some semi-official guidance on the problem would be preferred in that I'm personally not a fan of redundancy - in this case specifying the same repo multiple times assigning a different type to it each time. What it would inherently lead to IMO is a repoid conflict that the lockfile processor would have to solve, IOW it would need to be prepared to see the same repoid which should otherwise be unique and expect a different type, not sure I like that kind of approach because to me it smells a bit like non-determinism, hence my point on having a guidance.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2908#discussioncomment-8489397
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2908/comments/8489397 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240216/3fde859b/attachment.html>