[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)

[Panu Matilainen]

Coming back to this: to avoid gratuitious compatibility breakage, we can't put either 0 or 6 in there.
The best we can do is put 4 in there because all of rpm 4.x used 3 as the major version for alleged LSB compatibility, so it at least differentiates it a bit. It's not such a terrible lie even because the fundamental header structure of v6 is basically v4...

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-8528530
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2374/comments/8528530 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240220/2942fb4a/attachment-0001.html>