[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format draft, major update (Discussion #2919)

[Neal Gompa (ニール・ゴンパ)]

> proper multiarch dependencies (instead of ()(64bit) markers)

As a reminder, I took a stab at this in #360 and later #1038. The big change since then is the introduction of subarches for both ARM and x86_64, and I still expect that to happen for RISC-V too. What are we thinking for this now?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2919#discussioncomment-8529506
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2919/comments/8529506 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240220/9e112fb1/attachment.html>