[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Introduction of "rpms.lock.yaml" file (Discussion #2908)

[Erik Skultety]

> lockfileType - that distinguishes between rpms.in.yaml and rpms.lock.yaml)

I think this field is largely irrelevant since `rpms.in.yaml` is definitely completely out of scope for this discussion (as this is just the basis for the actual `rpms.lock.yaml`) as well as because it doesn't really do any job distinguishing anything, IMO you either have a full lockfile or you don't and in case of `rpms.in.yaml` it's just a template it's not even a lockfile per-se and you need a dedicated tool to understand specifically and only this type of description file to be able to get the final `rpms.lock.yaml`. So, let's not get ourselves concerned about the former here at all.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2908#discussioncomment-8547878
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2908/comments/8547878 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240221/a921042d/attachment.html>