[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Introduce an rpm-controlled per-build directory (PR #2885)

[Michal Domonkos]

Speaking of name bikeshedding,

> Other ponderings include the per-build directory macro name, should it be just %builddir without the underscore (instead of %pkgbuilddir)

This has gotten lost in the above chatter, but I think it's worth considering. It's a macro name that we'll be living with from now on and somehow `%builddir` feels more natural than `%pkgbuilddir`. To me, that is.

OTOH, the "pkg" prefix perhaps emphasizes that it's a *per-package* build directory as opposed to some common one (which is `%_top_builddir` now with the patch). So dunno. Maybe I'm overthinking it...

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2885#issuecomment-1969295446
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2885/c1969295446 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240228/8dcb20f3/attachment.html>