[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] API improvement to accommodate for RPM CoW (PR#1470) (Discussion #2057)

[Demi Marie Obenour]

@ddiss fsverity would also be suitable.  If you go with this approach, I recommend also including the total length of the payload in the (signed) header, to avoid vulnerabilities where extra data somehow doesn’t get hashed.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2057#discussioncomment-9281315
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2057/comments/9281315 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20240430/32f9f29e/attachment.html>