[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Evolution of the RPM package format (Discussion #3349)

[Jérôme Lanteri]

@pmatilai It's interesting to know all this history. Thank you for this time dedicated to the RedHat culture that explains things.
Would it be humanly conceivable to dare to ask that the old online manual can indicate to which version of librpm it refers, but also to use the same time possibly to write an updated version of the manual for the existing versions? So that, in addition, it becomes possible without tearing one's hair out, to learn how to use the API in C.
Thank you for all this humility and all these good intentions.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/3349#discussioncomment-11142235
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/3349/comments/11142235 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20241104/9eec91ac/attachment.html>