[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Exempt src.rpm packages from file signature business (PR #3470)

[Panu Matilainen]

@pmatilai commented on this pull request.



> -
-    if (flags & RPMSIGN_FLAG_FSVERITY) {
-	if (includeVeritySignatures(fd, &sigh, &h))
-	    goto exit;
+    /* Add file signatures (if requested and not a source rpm) */
+    if (!headerIsSource(h)) {
+	if (flags & RPMSIGN_FLAG_IMA) {
+	    if (includeFileSignatures(&sigh, &h))
+		goto exit;
+	}
+	if (flags & RPMSIGN_FLAG_FSVERITY) {
+	    if (includeVeritySignatures(fd, &sigh, &h))
+		goto exit;
+	}
+    } else if (flags & (RPMSIGN_FLAG_IMA | RPMSIGN_FLAG_FSVERITY)) {
+	rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING,

Yup. And in that case, a warning suggests there's something bad in what they do, but is there? Realizing this use-case, I don't think there is. So if anything, it should be a RPMLOG_DEBUG item actually, and otherwise just ignore the file signatures for src.rpms.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3470#discussion_r1858580788
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3470/review/2461603258 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20241126/fc1ab016/attachment.htm>