[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add support for multiple OpenPGP signatures per package (Issue #3385)

[Simo Sorce]

> I strongly oppose ASCII armor, as it injects a lot of additional malliability.

What does that even mean?
It is just a format with no ambiguity in representation.

Given the current code wants ASCII I would definitely just use the ASCII Armored signature directly and avoid the silly step. I see no need to force a binary representation.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3385#issuecomment-2509132731
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3385/2509132731 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20241130/65ea1e27/attachment.htm>