[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Implement a new openpgp.cert.d based keystore (Issue #3341)

[Neal H. Walfield]

> I don't care what the format looks like, but we should not use the same shared PGP certs directory used by plain Sequoia, GnuPG, etc.

Thanks for clarifying.  I was quite confused by your "anyway."  I agree that `rpm` should use its own certificate store.

> Essentially, we need to maintain the equivalent of our own keyring with our own import semantics.

What semantics are you thinking of here?  Why should rpm's import semantics differ from, say, vanilla sq.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3341#issuecomment-2388051591
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3341/2388051591 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20241002/26811dd3/attachment.html>