[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Turn nrefs into atomic_int (PR #3370)

[Florian Festi]

Yes, this is confusing, still it is not wrong. If the destructor code itself e.g. uses an iterator to free up sub components that iterator may add and then free a reference. This leads to a loop that tries to free the item over and over again unless the destructor code holds a proper reference.

>From an conceptual POV it is also correct that the destructor basically takes the last reference from the caller and holds it until it is finished with the clean up.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3370#issuecomment-2410420738
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3370/c2410420738 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20241014/9edfb985/attachment.html>