[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: multi-arch dependencies (Issue #2197)

[Panu Matilainen]

pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#2197)

Well, x86_32 is going to hang around for a long time as well. Anyway, the point being, there's no point encoding data that is irrelevant for the platform because it just wastes letters that could be better used for something else. x86_64 has it's share of other extensions (though those are now tracked via arch sublevels). 

Common flags would just force us to argue endlessly over whether a flag should be a common across all architectures etc and never getting anything added 😅  

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197#issuecomment-2662312485
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197/2662312485 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20250216/2564b650/attachment.htm>