[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: multi-arch dependencies (Issue #2197)

[Panu Matilainen]

pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#2197)

Yet more musings on this: starting to think maybe we should just slap the endianness to the end of the bitness field, eg
"64l" or "32b" regardless of the arch, because this is a fundamental piece of info in every ELF object. That'd be one reason to have that flags-field anywhere so the exceptions would really stand out, and it'd be consistent everywhere. It's not like there'd be an insurmountable amount of space wasted by that. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197#issuecomment-2664814211
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197/2664814211 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20250217/170cece4/attachment-0001.htm>