[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM for non-supported subarch (Discussion #3501)

[Sergio Losilla]

That's correct, we control it all. If anything, we can tolerate that someone gets in trouble because of adding a repo they shouldn't have.
And yes, getting extra performance that is worth all the extra hassle is something that remains to be seen, but my first attempt to start testing that was to just replace the arch in our RPM spec. I'll do the testing by hand then, and we'll see about publishing to a repo later.
Thanks a lot!

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/3501#discussioncomment-11772527
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/3501/comments/11772527 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20250108/6aa5d2a8/attachment-0001.htm>