[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Won't new Auto-Vaccum feature in RPM be seen as a major performance regression by some users? (Discussion #3520)

[Panu Matilainen]

Like said, it's entirely possible the initial cut-off size may need fine-tuning to only occur on larger transactions, time will tell.
Doing the vacuum is a win anyhow because the db slows down as it grows even if its half-empty, besides wasting diskspace. This was particularly bad with BDB but IIRC plenty visible with sqlite too, at least on spinning disks.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/3520#discussioncomment-11854582
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/3520/comments/11854582 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20250116/02288f52/attachment.htm>