[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Evolution of the RPM package format (Discussion #3349)
Piotr Dobrogost
notifications at github.com
Thu Jul 17 07:27:41 UTC 2025
@pmatilai
> So in a nutshell, a v6 package is just what v4 with all bells and whistles enabled can do, and obsolete crypto dropped.
Does it mean that a tool which handles v4 format can't handle v6 format because fields which it expects (with MD5 sums for example) are no longer present?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/3349#discussioncomment-13787431
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/3349/comments/13787431 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20250717/424dcb2d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rpm-maint
mailing list