[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Implement support for literal and one-shot macro modifiers (PR #4129)

[Vít Ondruch]

voxik left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#4129)

Do I understand correctly that `NAME BODY` behaves the same as `NAME<> BODY`? But also that the latter has different behavior than `NAME<l> BODY` as well as `NAME<o> BODY`? If that is the case, shouldn't there also be e.g. `NAME<d> BODY` (where `d` stands for default) which would have the same behavior as `NAME BODY` / `NAME<> BODY`.

Sorry, still trying to understand the scenarios where this would be useful. The added example certainly does good job for the `o` option. Thanks 👍

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4129#issuecomment-3996264427
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4129/c3996264427 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20260304/7e3010b4/attachment-0001.htm>