[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Move rpmuncompress to the standard binary directory (PR #4156)
Panu Matilainen
notifications at github.com
Tue Mar 31 09:37:25 UTC 2026
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ function(makemacros)
set(infodir "\${prefix}/${CMAKE_INSTALL_INFODIR}")
set(mandir "\${prefix}/${CMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR}")
set(rundir /run)
+ set(bindir_full ${CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_BINDIR})
It's a fair question. The current default `%_install_script_path` makes all sorts of implicit assumptions about the ways of the world, like how packaged content should be in / and /usr and /usr/local being non-system stuff that shouldn't be used in scripts. But then we default to that location.
I'm a bit wary of touching that because it exposes scriptlets to unknown things just depending on what prefix rpm itself was built into. That line has been last touched in 2000, and actually that's the commit where it was introduced in :flushed:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4156?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADLPZU3N374U4GDZ5KJR2G34TOGVLA5CNFSNUABKM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2QOVWGYUTFOF2WK43UKJSXM2LFO4XTIMBTGYYDINRYGEZ2M4TFMFZW63VKON2WE43DOJUWEZLEUVSXMZLOOS6XA4S7OJSXM2LFO5PW433UNFTGSY3BORUW63TTL5RWY2LDNM#discussion_r3014708287
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4156/review/4036046813 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20260331/28cfa487/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rpm-maint
mailing list