[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm plugin (Discussion #4080)

[Daniel Alley]

@pmatilai On a related note - I suppose, then, that where the Rust bindings wrap the `build` and `sign` parts of librpm (which are separate directories - not under `lib/` - and compile to separate `.so` files) we do need to be careful about licensing, because per this description those are probably considered GPL only.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/4080#discussioncomment-18333131
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/4080/comments/18333131 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/attachments/20260907/e185474f/attachment.htm>